-advertisment-
Business

Time: 2024-08-19

Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Insights on AstraZeneca Controversy

Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Insights on AstraZeneca Controversy
-advertisment-

Financial Compensation for Vaccine Damage in the UK

Nearly 14,000 people in the United Kingdom have applied for financial compensation due to alleged harm caused by Covid vaccines , according to new figures . The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme ( VDPS ) has seen a surge in applications , with around 97 % of successful claims relating to the AstraZeneca jab . Payments have been awarded for various conditions , including strokes , heart attacks , dangerous blood clots , inflammation of the spinal cord , excessive swelling of the vaccinated limb , and facial paralysis . The scheme , established in 1979 , has processed approximately 16,000 applications , with the majority now being Covid - related.

Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Insights on AstraZeneca Controversy

AstraZeneca Vaccine Controversy

One notable case is that of Leona Sanders , the wife of British champion flat race jockey Seb Sanders , who was left hospital - bound after receiving three Covid jabs , primarily AstraZeneca . Despite being told that the vaccine would not interfere with her autoimmune disorder granulomatosis , Leona 's compensation request was denied . Her condition deteriorated rapidly after the third vaccine , leading to paralysis and a diagnosis of transverse myelitis , a known side effect of the vaccine . The medical assessor rejected the claim , citing a history of back pain and falls that Leona had never experienced before the jab . Mr. Sanders expressed frustration at the denial and emphasized the need for a thorough investigation into such cases.

Government Response and Compensation

The UK government continued to recommend the AstraZeneca jab despite warnings and halts in other European countries . While over 5,500 claims have been rejected , only 175 cases have received payments of £ 120,000 each . Medical assessors have been cautious in approving claims , citing insufficient evidence of vaccine - induced harm . Despite nearly 1,000 requests for case reconsideration , only 12 have been successful in reversing the initial decision . This has sparked debate and raised concerns about the transparency and accountability of the VDPS in addressing vaccine - related injuries and providing fair compensation to affected individuals.

Challenges and Calls for Review

Thousands of individuals in the UK have faced challenges in seeking financial compensation for alleged vaccine - related harm , with the majority of successful claims linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine . The case of Leona Sanders highlights the complexities and uncertainties surrounding vaccine damage claims , as well as the emotional and physical toll on affected individuals and their families . As more people seek recourse for vaccine injuries , there is a growing demand for a comprehensive review of the VDPS to ensure fair and timely compensation for those impacted by the Covid jabs . The ongoing debate underscores the importance of transparency , accountability , and patient advocacy in the context of vaccination programs and public health policy.

-advertisment-
-advertisment-
-advertisment-