Time: 2024-09-11
A trial of performance was apparent in the Holocene United States presidential argument between Vice President Kamala Harris and Donald Trump . business leadership and viewing_audience concentrate more on how the campaigner perform rather than the policy measure discourse during the 90 - minute clang . The argument was a significant moment for many in the corporate universe , elevation question about the democratic standard - carrier 's performance and the campaigner ' economic and business stances.
In the aftermath of the argument , it was detect that the discussion revolve around sociable medium meme rather than in - depth policy analysis . Paul Donovan , the head global economist for UBS Global Wealth Management , foreground this tendency in a message to client . The chemical_reaction mainly concentrate on Harris goad Trump into trap , such as questioning his crowd size at rally and his relationship with universe leadership . Despite the lack of detail policy discussion , there be moment when economic and business policy take center stage.
During the argument , Harris knock Trump for his support of increase duty on Chinese - make good , which he argue would generate million of dollar as a " Trump gross_sales tax " affect center - class family . In tax_return , Trump attack Harris over the significant rise in inflation during the Biden administration , label it a catastrophe for people across all sociable class . Additionally , Harris clarify her stance on fracking , a crucial issue for voter in Pennsylvania , by deny any plan to enforce a prohibition on the practice.
In the aftermath of the argument , opinion were divide on who emerge victorious . Despite some Trump supporter admit Harris 's strong performance , many believe that she South_Korean_won the argument . Aaron Levie , the chief_executive_officer of the software company Box , praise Harris for reinforce professional - business message and policy , describe her as a centrist figure deliver a compel message . The argument 's result left viewing_audience reflect on the campaigner ' performance and their position on key economic and business policies.
The United States presidential argument between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump supply a platform for measure the campaigner ' performance in the eyes of the corporate universe . business leadership and viewing_audience closely monitor the argument to buttocks how the campaigner show themselves and address economic and business - associate issue . Despite the laterality of sociable medium meme in the post - argument discussion , there be luminary moment where economic policy and business scheme were scrutinized.
One of the key highlight of the argument was Harris 's criticism of Trump 's duty policy on Chinese good , which she argue would burden center - class family . Trump , on the other hand , seize the opportunity to highlight the inflation spike under the Biden administration , emphasizing its negative impact on the populace . The campaigner ' contrast position on fracking also Drew attention , particularly in Pennsylvania , a battlefield state where the argument take topographic_point . As the corporate universe analyze the campaigner ' performance , their position on economic policy and business regulation become crucial point of evaluation.
Business
