-advertisment-
Business

Time: 2024-09-05

Supercomputer Export Regulation Strategy for China Growth

Supercomputer Export Regulation Strategy for China Growth
-advertisment-

The U.S. government is facing criticism for its regulation on supercomputer and AI technology export to China . critic argue that the limit on computer_science speed will impede invention and decelerate down advancement in the field . The regulation purpose to prevent the cargo of advance technology , such as AI french_fries and supercomputer , to China , where there be a growth demand for high - performance computing.

The propose law , know as Provisions refer to U.S. investing in certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of concern , set particular threshold for computer_science power , with a minimum calculate speed of 100 petaflops and an AI computer_science threshold of 10 ^ 26 floating-point_operation . However , critic believe that these threshold may become outdated as technology continue to progress rapidly.

The Center for a New American Security has foreground concern that the propose regulation may not support pace with the evolve landscape of AI technology . They argue that the U.S. is already fall behind in footing of computer_science speed requirement , with Chinese company development AI model that exceed the propose thresholds.

Supercomputer Export Regulation Strategy for China Growth

company like ByteDance , Alibaba , and others have already excel the 10 ^ 24 threshold , and there are concern that the regulation may not accurately capture the computer_science capability of emerge AI model . critic also point out that trailing minutes involve China could be challenge for AI startup owner , especially those of Chinese heritage.

The U.S. government 's attempt to restrict technology export to China have also confront resistance from industry group like the Semiconductor Industry Association and the National Venture Capital Association . They argue that the fiscal burden of conformity with the regulation could be significant , potentially reach up to 00 million . These group fear that the restriction could injury the competitiveness of U.S. company in the semiconductor industry.

venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz has propose that the focus should be on the type of foreign entity involve in minutes , rather than rigorous computer_science power threshold . They believe that a more target approach is necessitate to precaution national security without suppression innovation.

As the argument over regulation continue , the technical_school industry is push for clear definition and a more concentrate scheme to address national security concern while support invention and keep the global competitiveness of U.S. company . It remains to be see how the government will react to these concern and whether any revision will be make to the propose regulations.

-advertisment-
-advertisment-
-advertisment-